Quote from: lars on May 10, 2025, 12:58:10 AMQuote from: Willybomb on April 22, 2025, 04:08:14 PMIt certainly doesn't have the X factor.99% of the time, the "X factor" is just perception. You tell someone they're listening to AI music, and they spit out the wine, gagging over "how terrible it is". You don't tell them what it is, and they think they're drinking something good. I tried out making 80's adult contemporary music on Suno, and it knocked it out of the park. There is no way an unbiased, non-cork sniffery, going in blind person would think this was a computer:
https://suno.com/s/1M8g9zEKJy0wHKYp
The days of "the only way to make music is plugging directly into a vintage amp with a guitar nobody can afford" are over.
Deal with it.
It's not about dealing with it, or perception, it's about sounding *really* generic tonally and stylistically because it's been scraped off a multitude of bands within the genre they're aping. One of the songs my friend posted had vocals where you could really hear Billy Corgan or the riffs were an inch off an STP riff.
With training and refinement, I'm sure you could get something happening within your "voice". Straight off the bat, it sounds "good", but it isn't anything special and the vocal phrasing is often a bit weird.
When my students have used AI for their essays, you can easily tell because stock ChatGPT is too wordy and likes to show how fancy it is. Likewise, when it's used for a band blurb or advertisement it's a starting point at best because it's too over the top.
I'm not against AI, it's a bit of fun and can help you get started - but at the default settings (which is how most people use it) it's generic, inoffensive, and not particularly imaginative (and in ChatGPT's case, often wrong).
For poops and giggles, I put this together as a reel to promote a gig. One day I'll pay to get the watermark removed but today is not that day:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DI_PHJhMNVn/